MST. MUMTAZ BEGUM versus PROVINCE OF SINDH
Sections 42, 54 and 55 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. VI, R17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 were sought on the basis of the events sought after the declaration and permanent injunction in the constitutional petition. ? The effect is that the defendants had no legal right to encroach on the suit plot and were asked to issue a permanent injunction to prevent the plaintiff from interfering with their possession. The plaintiff's case, from this suit plot After the settlement, the plaintiff requested an amendment so that the mandatory injunction could be relieved of discrimination and discrimination. The Profit Trial Court rejected the amendment request in a timely manner, which the trial court upheld on the basis that its grant would be equivalent to introducing a new cause. And wanting to amend the outcome of the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sukkur lawyer