Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MST. MUMTAZ BEGUM versus PROVINCE OF SINDH


Sections 42, 54 and 55 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. VI, R17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 were sought on the basis of the events sought after the declaration and permanent injunction in the constitutional petition. ? The effect is that the defendants had no legal right to encroach on the suit plot and were asked to issue a permanent injunction to prevent the plaintiff from interfering with their possession. The plaintiff's case, from this suit plot After the settlement, the plaintiff requested an amendment so that the mandatory injunction could be relieved of discrimination and discrimination. The Profit Trial Court rejected the amendment request in a timely manner, which the trial court upheld on the basis that its grant would be equivalent to introducing a new cause. And wanting to amend the outcome of the case.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sukkur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.