OX, Rr 2, 4 & O IX R 13 The request to set aside the object of the former party decree plaintiff was that the defendant had not filed such a plea of guilty in criminal cases and his oath was Was filed with counterfeit signatures, therefore, personally seeking them before the court was necessary to validate their signatures on which the plaintiff's spouse was present in court as his special counsel. By refusing to respond to the defendant's request for such a hearing, he did not comply with the repeated instructions and carefully submitted it in person. Was on. Therefore, assuming that such an application was not filed by him, it is necessary to have Val, the correct respondent, to answer such an objection, which he alone could answer. Through his lawyer or special counsel, information about the information was deliberately failed to appear before the trial court's decision before the trial court's defendant despite his felony conviction. In accordance with TX, R 4 (2), CPC, as directed by the court, in the event that a party does not appear in court within the due date, the court shall Declare a judgment against or may issue an order to fit the case. Unknown order was not subject to any factual or legal impairment
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
