MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ versus ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE (INVESTIGATION) PUNJAB, LAHORE
Sections 156 and 173 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Under section 173, after the submission of the final police report / challan, the investigation / exchange of investigation, the CC scope suspect (applicant) was declared innocent by the police and The report was filed under CRPCR. Only the co-accused was presented to the extent of the accused, however, the trial court summoned the accused to trial, the police applied for a change of investigation from the Additional Inspector General of Police, and finally a letter / order Accordingly, the investigator, who was assigned to the investigation separately, did not claim that the investigating officer did not record the statement of any of his witnesses during the investigation. Or that the investigating officer mistakenly recorded any witness statement under Section 161, CR PC. Or the complainant stopped presenting a document to the investigating officer. Or the investigating officer did not consider any of the documents prepared by the complainant before the final comment was made. Or that under Section 1773 of this report, the CCP was defective in any way because it did not pick up all the material submitted by the complainant at the time of the investigation unless the complainant accused any of the ingredients mentioned above. Had not been identified, and serious flaws had been identified in the investigation, it may have been allowed to re-examine this case while pursuing the earlier report under Section 7373, CRPC, after which the trial court Had not only taken the matter seriously through charging but also sought the trial court accused in the cases in which the case was to proceed. Based on the report already submitted under Section 7311, P.O.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
