Find a Lawyer

RANA SURBLAND KHAN versus B.K. ENTERPRISES

Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872, section 2 (b) (c) (e) suit for specific performance of the contract is a valid contract, a unilateral offer jurisdiction; For a lawsuit filed in a suit that was not signed by either party and the appeal against it was dismissed, the plaintiff rejected the amendment saying that the oral agreement was specifically enforceable. Can a promise be made if the plaintiff demands specific performance of the oral agreement - one such promise by one party and the other by the other party? Speaking - Unilateral offers that are not accepted by the other party cannot be made on the basis of specific performance. There will be at least two people for the establishment of a valid contract. In the absence of consent and its offer and acceptance, such document cannot be specified if the offer and acceptance of the agreement were reduced in writing if signed or signed by a party. Otherwise it cannot be construed as a enforceable contract under the law because the amendment under Or was

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2015 PCrLJ 678
• Mst. SAFIA AKHTAR v. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION 2015 CLD 679
• SHAHIDA ILAHI v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2015 CLC 680
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. DOABA PLASTICS INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. 2015 PTD 681
• Mst. SHAZIA v. SOHAIL NAZIR KHAN 2015 YLR 684
• ISHAQ AHMAD v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, MULTAN 2015 MLD 684
• Mian ABDUL QUDDOUS v. Mst. SURRYA MIR 2015 PLD 687
• ABDUL RAZZAQ v. NISAR ALI 2015 CLC 696

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

criminal advocate from Neelam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes