Section 2 302 (b) did not define the evidence as delayed in filing a crime report for the prosecution's version, the victim's father / victim's father's statement was based on the hearing, and he was at the bus stop The angry suspect was seen in distress. The condition, while blood stains on his clothes as witnesses of the prosecution witnesses, was the only witness to the incident, who was 10 years old at the time of his testifying at the time of his testimony, before the court. Mental capacity was determined before the court. Through the trial court, the trial court, after being satisfied with the responses of its witnesses, recorded its statement, presenting more than eight questions, while from the moment the details were constantly made about the prosecution's version, It was the accused who did not make any breach, which may be of more importance to believe, that it would not be safe to rely on the statement of the witness, the medical evidence showed the defendant's version of the accused Hutchett was fully supported, sent to the Chemical Examiner / Serologist's office, who said that Ni was stained with blood. According to the prosecution's other characteristics of the witnesses, the complainant, who was the victim's father, had no ill will or ex-hostility, which made the accused, who was his brother, the real culprit. During the indictment, against the accused, his name was found to be correct, and his name was placed in column number 3 of the report prepared under Section 173, CCPVipen hatchet. , Firearms used by the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
