ISHAQ AHMAD versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, MULTAN
Section 3 and 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 of the Constitution Detention Order, precluded the District Coordination Officer, Scope Petitioners from accepting custody orders against him on charges of having relations with organizations banned from duty. Due to the independence of a person and therefore such powers were entrusted to the District Coordination Officers, who were expected to be irresponsible, the police liaison reports to the district liaison officers against the police agency are not yet implemented. Until they had convinced themselves that such reports were accurate and that they were also supported by the solid material material that the District Coordination Officers ordered in connection with any of Dantes's alleged activities. Passed without any kind of intelligence, therefore, he deviated from one of his sacred duties. Detention of detainees detained on the basis of speculation and speculation in the detention orders was ambiguous, detained authorities detained Dantes High Court under the jurisdiction of the constitutional jurisdiction. Did not mind to satisfy myself for the issuance of orders. These options and the detention orders by the applicants were set on a free trial.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
