MST. SAFIA AKHTAR versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION
Sections 118 and 122 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 19, 149 and article 86 (a) of the Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII, R 11, compute the period of limitation of the life insurance claim The effect of the confession In addition to the claimant's request for a life insurance claim, the insurance tribunal denied on the basis that it was banned over time, claiming the claimant's timely affirmation. Will go The obligation was written by the insurance corporation before the Federal Ombudsman, the insured died on 23 December 2007, and the claimant's claim was rejected by the insurance corporation on 13 8 2009, after which the claimant filed before the Federal Ombudsman. The complaint was filed before which the video post was submitted 28 6 2012; an acknowledgment was issued by the insurance corporation in writing of the claim of the claimant. Therefore, the fresh period of delimitation should be determined from 6-9 28 2012 when the above mentioned obligations were signed and section 19 of the Limitation Act 1908 is therefore applicable to the present issue. The question of limitation was a mixed question of law and facts and so on. As such, a decision cannot be made without a recording of the evidence and the Tribunal failed to consider the application of section 19 of the Limitation Act 1908 and the applicant's application, applying Article 86 (a) of the Limitation Act 1908, was not briefly denied. Can be done (A) the Limitation Act, 1908, shall apply when the claimant's claim is payable, whereas in the present case the claimant's claim was again postponed, and the insurance tribunal ignored this aspect of the case while the higher order of refusal. In passing, the Supreme Court upheld the issue
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
