MEHBOOB ALI versus THE STATE
Section 526 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 / 337A (i) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) The transfer of the complaint of the accused was that the trial court decided the case on a specific date. Was listed. In the course of dealing with this case, all the cases except the High Court were adjourned and it was stated that the trial court was directed to adjourn the matter indefinitely and the High Court did not adjourn the matter. Was as directed. There was also the opinion that the accused were interested in prolonging the proceedings as much as possible; according to the complainant's counsel, the accused were planning to delay and obstruct the finalization of the case on the merit, transfer of the High Court. The refusal case was not open to any exceptions. The leave to appeal was accordingly denied to the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Tando Jam lawyer
