Find a Lawyer

WILAYAT KHAN versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Sections 13 and 31 pre-discrimination litigation evidence was issued by the Notice Revenue Authorities Most of the material evidence of the student's evidence was contradictory because the evidence was not credible and Was not relied upon by the trial court. In this case, the land umpire's dispute was that the Revenue Authority at large did not publicly give notice of the change, so it was disclosed by this informant. The suit was dismissed by the trial court, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and decided the case. Listened. In the same area of disputed land where Validatee pre-emptor was a co-participant, it was not possible for him to confirm the variation in SE3, according to the time prescribed in the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, regarding pre-emptor sales. I failed to present reliable, factual, and reliable evidence of the knowledge that was inadmissible, and the decision and order passed by the appellate court over the material contradictions were set aside and reviewed. Was granted registration advocate from Mehmood Kot lawyer