Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZOFIGAN versus MUHAMMAD KHAN

Sections 8 and 42 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 6, 8 and 142 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 11 suit challenging the sale of illegal property in minority limits by his father. Was approved for. 6 12 1972 The case was registered on the plaintiff's minor on 30 197 1974 31 197 1977 The trial court ruled in this case, but the appellate court made the same case to the plaintiff under section 8 of the Dismissal Act, 1908. Dismissed. 31 7 1977) As a starting point for delimitation and is entitled to benefit from Section 6 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the termination of such claimant can set a case within six years, but not for claim only. But also to recover the occupation. The limitation period under Article 142 of the Limitation Act 1908 was 12 years, which was also the period from the date of suit 6 12 2 1972 (ie the date of sale) to 30 of 1974 (ie the date of acquisition of majority by the claimant). h The court allowed the appeal, set aside the unclean verdict and order and upheld the trial court's approval, thereby securing the verdict. best law firms from Theing Jattan More lawyer