MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus MST. SHAHIDA PARVEEN
Article 5, Schedule and 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was the request of the claimant in the recovery or substitution of dowry articles that no dowry was given to the claimant at the marriage which he claimed as praying. Had been found by a local court to have such articles impossible to recover, therefore, the cost of its recovery was directed. The plaintiff was requested that such directive be without jurisdiction because the order did not find the amount to be paid by him in alternative validity words. important The important ones, which had to be read with the claimant's prayer clause, which, when seeking an order for the recovery of the articles of the dowry, were made the local commissioner of the prayer in exchange for the price reported in the report. Most of the articles were either missing or destroyed or damaged, while some did not belong to the plaintiff. The accused had prepared some articles before the local commission's offer, but the plaintiff did not have the articles under the claim. Because of the same refusal to accept, the written statement stated that the plaintiff did not claim to be separated from any article of dowry. Which relates to the claimant and was applied to the satisfaction of the claimant. There was no need to appoint him when the defendant once refused to take possession of the articles of dowry, then, the court decided to resign, instead of paying the price / price of the dowry articles. As instructed, the High Court dismissed the constitutional application within the limits
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Bhimbar lawyer