LUQMAN AKHTAR versus THE STATE
Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 354, 451 and 452 Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/18 bail, prior grant, the accused was granted bail and The case was settled. The prosecutor's evidence pleaded at the trial date that his lawyer was not ready to examine the prosecution's witnesses who were present at that date, and in his order, the prosecution sought a trial court that the accused changed four lawyers. And they were extending the case. Different excuses and such bail exemptions were misused The trial court canceled the bail granted by the accused and said that the accused had been granted bail by using tactics to misuse the process of law. His right was upheld, the accused assured, that if he was, he was admitted on bail, his lawyer would appear regularly in the trial court and would not seek any adjournment during any pretrial trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Ghari Dupatta lawyer