JUNAID JAMSHED versus UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SICENCES
Article 199 Constitutional application wrongly impacted by authorities in academic institutions Conflicting performance: Medical candidate entering admission test at medical college was a candidate for admission to medical college and wrong examination center was mentioned in admission card due to authorities error And on the day of the exam, the applicant had to apply. The applicant's attempt to move to the appropriate test centers was that if the applicant was informed directly about a suitable center in time before the date of the test, his performance was poor. Is not Authorities say the university immediately acted on the admission test date. And it also allowed the applicant to take the entry test at the correct test center, although when he arrived there after the time was up, the accuracy dispute started at the point where the university knew of the error, and if the error entry The date of the test was already known. Then why he did not speak directly, in view of the fact that his contact number and email address were available with the University in response to the question whether the applicant had verified the location of his test center. For newspapers or university websites. Whether the applicant does not arrive at the test center before 9 am (scheduled time) on the date of admission test. And that at that time the disputed questions of fact resolution were delivered through contentious questions about the contentious questions which the High Court usually referred to by a university with constitutional jurisdiction to investigate the matter. The committee decided to set up these steps
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
