SYED IMRAN HASSAN GILLANI versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, RAWALPINDI /ISLAMABAD
Section 5 (A) and 12 Freezing of Property The private person was enraged over the appellate court's order ruling on the freezing of his property to the appellant, with Judge Order of the chairman chairman NAB already confirmed with the court. Provided that the order passed by the trial court was not required. The accused allegedly received more than 90 million rupees, which was transferred from the account of the accused to the company account as defined in Section 5 (a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. Was gone, including one person. Who had a reasonable basis to believe that he was involved in or was involved in a crime that was heard under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, or that the matter was investigated or investigated by the NAB Appellant at the relevant time and thereafter Deliberately frozen order was frozen No illegal interference was encountered or appeal of any weakness was dismissed under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
