Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ZAKIR versus THE STATE


Section 5 and 7 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1880), Section 302/109/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Determination of the Age of Trial The Ossication Test accused claimed on the basis of the trial separation. At that time, he was under 18 years of age because of the crime. Medical Board, after examining the accused, found out that he was 20 years old. The trial court heard the trial of the accused by the accused. Denied that the trial court had presented before the trial court the reliance on the ossication test and the birth certificate and the school leaving certificate were ignored. The review petition filed by the accused against the Royal Court order was rightly dismissed, which denied the appeal to appeal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Mastoi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.