Articles 9 (2) and 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 High Court's Constitutional Jurisdiction Alternative Remedies Remedies, there is no benefit to filing an appeal under Article 32 of the Office of Federal Ombudsman Order 1983. Approved by the Federal Ombudsman, the authorities appealed to the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court application, which the High Court rejected on the basis that alternative alternative treatment was available to the authorities as a result of which they had legitimate authority in the matter. The Supreme Court will cover the inept and careless and careless manner of the officers who were established under the facts of the Constitution petition under the Federal Ombudsman Order 1983. Failure to seek the provisions of Article 32 of establishing an office. Denying federal ombudsman and High Court orders, making them unreasonable and unimaginable, did not guarantee interference.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
