Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS versus ABDUL BARI KHAN


Articles 9 (2) and 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 High Court's Constitutional Jurisdiction Alternative Remedies Remedies, there is no benefit to filing an appeal under Article 32 of the Office of Federal Ombudsman Order 1983. Approved by the Federal Ombudsman, the authorities appealed to the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court application, which the High Court rejected on the basis that alternative alternative treatment was available to the authorities as a result of which they had legitimate authority in the matter. The Supreme Court will cover the inept and careless and careless manner of the officers who were established under the facts of the Constitution petition under the Federal Ombudsman Order 1983. Failure to seek the provisions of Article 32 of establishing an office. Denying federal ombudsman and High Court orders, making them unreasonable and unimaginable, did not guarantee interference.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Kamokey lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.