Find a Lawyer

SHAHRA versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB

The objection of the petitioner not submitting the application for approval of the change in compliance with the Decree of Civil Procedure, Section 21 of the Punjab Pre-Amendment Act (1913 Constitution of 1913) was that the approval of the change was made without any order by the court of jurisdiction. Could not be given. The money, as ordered in the preliminary injunction, was given full ownership rights over the land to the pre-emptor / decree holder, on whom the decree was granted. Was that changes could be approved on the basis of an order without repetition. In the case of the execution of a court under the taxation rules, the execution of the court in this case will involve the case when the debtor has failed to take possession of the land which the execution court has issued through the issuance of a warrant of possession. Delivery through was mandatory. On the basis of pre-discrimination orders, the Revenue Authorities should have sought prior orders from the Executive Court Revenue Outs. The upheaval properly approved the change so that the appeal could be dismissed. immigration advocates phone number from Lakimarwat lawyer