MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Section 28 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application The right to ease the use of open space The applicant, who was one of the villagers, claimed that the villagers were using open space owned by the authority and Is entitled without any use. The constraints on behalf of the aforementioned authority called for relief to be directed to reopen the gates and entrances which were closed by the authority for no legal reason, which the applicant took constitutional jurisdiction. They should establish their legal right to it. Open space, but in relation to the land in dispute, he had no right to an acknowledgment of the authority petitioner, who allegedly failed to establish his legal right in this regard. Tried to enforce the right of ease, was bound by its request. Should the applicant be dismissed, if there is a complaint, the proper remedy for that would be to seek relief from another forum as a contentious question. The facts cannot be interpreted in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
