Find a Lawyer

SYED AFTAB AHMED JAFRI versus PAKISTAN

Removal of Rr 3, 4 and 7 from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 from Sections 4 and 9 (XVII) on the basis of inquiries. The officer was removed from service Government servants filed an appeal before the service tribunal against his dismissal order and were told that because of the appeal, a government employee was ordered to be reinstated, but he was reinstated. Not long after taking office, he was suspended for exercising his powers. Under Section 4 of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, thereafter a charge sheet was issued as the basis for the civil, preliminary action against the servant, as a result of the restraining order, the service tribunal employed a civil servant. Announcement of Appeal has become invalid: After the cancellation of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, the government had the authority to take action against civil servants. Nader said the ordinance or government employees (competence and discipline) ) Under the Rules 1973, because it was said that the rules were not repealed until then and were to be followed under the construction principle. S action will be considered once the legal action was taken against the employee in accordance with the law. And the final order was pending before the service tribunal, the decision to cancel and start proceedings, it could not be understood that the order to restore the public servant using public power, then issued a new proceeding. Is gone The Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 could not be retained and was responsible for the employment of the Government before the Service Tribunal was restored. law firms from Khewra lawyer