Find a Lawyer

HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD. versus COMMISSIONER, WORKMEN\'S COMPENSATION AND AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT, NAWABSHAH

Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was dismissed for claim of full grant of unpaid grant, the employee of the mill was dismissed on charges of corruption, he made all his due The full and final settlement was received by the employee, the claim was filed. The full benefit of the unpaid before the Commissioner, Workman's Compensation and Payment of Wages Act, 1936. To which the Mill filed its response authority, recording the evidence of both parties, instead of filing a written argument. Sue to file a lawsuit. Arguments, the filing of a constitutional petition challenging the jurisdiction of the authority and validation of the maintenance of the application filed by the employee were aggravated by the action initiated by the applicant (mill), upon receipt of notice from the authority. Should have referred to the High Court immediately, but the petitioner (MIL) did not do this for five years and filed a constitutional petition. The case was finally settled for arguments. The legal questions raised by the applicant with the authority. Had the power to decide, but the applicant sought Article 199 of the Constitution's petitioner (s) Under waited too long to apply the jurisdiction of the High Court, although there was no action. It would be appropriate and appropriate for the High Court to come to the High Court and for the Authority to process the employees' request and approve the orders, including the legal objection filed by the applicant on behalf of the applicant. Not a legal object filed with immigration advocate from Dandot lawyer