Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD, HUSSAIN versus NIHAR HUSSAIN

Sections 156 (1), (8), (14), (47) 77 (1), (86), (89), (90) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 154 and 156 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973). , Article 199 Constitution Petition The FIR allegation against the accused was to be dismissed that he, along with his comrades, wrongly misrepresented / unlawfully mislead the government with its legitimate income ie customs duty, sales tax, etc. Was. An attempt was made to cancel the description and quality of the imported goods on the basis that it was registered against the accused garland. That the authorities had filed 21 more FIs against the accused. That judicial proceedings are pending before the relevant authorities, cannot be investigated by the FIR-based authority and that the cases against the accused related to the misconduct and non-declaration started after the registration of the FIR. And the object of the investigation was assembled. The High Court of Evidence did not have the authority to interfere with the police investigation and assume the role of the investigator, nor did it have the authority to oversee or control the investigating agencies, which had the power to prosecute and investigate. Could not normally be tested under it. The constitutional jurisdiction which may be equivalent to interfering with a police investigation cannot also be considered by the investigating agency through a judicial inquiry into the matter of corruption and the inquiry which is required by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. The option may not be used. A decision-making process was pending before the authorities concerned, could not be investigated; FIR was abolished in law female advocates from Issa Khel lawyer