Find a Lawyer

MALIK MUHAMMAD NOOR KHAN versus THE STATE

The testimony of section 320 evidence was allegedly witnessed by two police officers and took place in a densely populated area, but no private person has been examined, according to one of the prosecution's statement. The accused was driving the vehicle fast and carelessly even though the other witness also said that the accused was driving quickly and negligently, the evidence was not accepted by any private witness or in any case the accused. Had examined himself on oath and denied the prosecution's case. Medical evidence cannot be considered a contradictory piece of evidence. As an ocular evidence, it only shows that the person who died due to the injuries did not support the prosecution's case and was named as a prosecution because it was not eyewitness to the alleged witness who was a police officer. Was not added to. The first time he witnessed the incident, he was detained, but he was publicly escaped. The prosecution of the E-Criminal Court failed to prove his case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt; the trial court convicted the accused. Was in set circumstances family advocate from Babri Banda lawyer