Find a Lawyer

MOOSA versus ZAFAR MUHAMMAD GAZNAVI

Article 12 (2) and AXXIII, R3 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 High Court Appeal for Specific Performance of Contract Decision Writing Request for Separation of Decree on Deception Within one month after filing a lawsuit by both the plaintiff and the defendant under oh XXII, R 3, CPC, each allegation made by the plaintiff against which he admitted The matter was to be dismissed and the decree passed on conditionally. The High Court, instead of approving the decree in the case of a compromise between the parties, ruled that the parties should appear before the official Guinea, who, after examining the parties and examining the records, was informed about the facts, suit properties of the parties. I will submit the report. After examining the official Assignee after the alleged compromise between the parties, the parties submitted the report and the plaintiff sought time to file objections to the said report. The order directed the authority to file the High Court on the land. Regardless of the settlement decision, the government obtained an order from the court, the government filed an application for section 12 (2) without attracting the attention of the parties. Under the CPC, the rejection of the said decree which allegedly the plaintiff and defendant alleged was fraudulent and wrong. The statement was obtained by the High Court, the request of the plaintiff is approved by the government with the consent of the plaintiff and the consent of the plaintiff is stated with the instructions which are appropriate. The defendant's consent to the evidence was obtained divorce advocates from Chak Jhumra lawyer