Sections 455, 440, 382 and 506 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 417 (2) and 249A Lurking were committed after preparing to commit the crime of house or house break, adultery, theft, death. From the day of the formal accusation of the appeal against the acquittal to the acquittal of the unclean order of acquittal, the appellant / complainant was involved in presenting the same testimony, the complainant / appellant of the trial Did not conduct the investigation himself during the period and was not sincere in examining the prosecution's witnesses before. Appellant's motive for the trial appeared to drag the accused in court indefinitely and was nothing more than that, the constraints on access to justice cannot be taken as a precaution, but all of them Under the circumstances, the parties involved were involved in litigation and conduct. In order to promote the purpose of justice, the trial court's accused also, in the present case, were required to take notice of the remaining matters, which was based on an oral claim based on a five-year and ten-month close trial on the charges filed. The controversial order to do so was neither unreasonable, unwanted, invasive nor did it cause dishonor. The executive order was neither illegal nor caused any misunderstanding of justice. And it was felt that a reasonable and reasonable appeal against acquittal for reasons was excluded, and the Judicial Magistrate granted it under Section 249A, the PCP was retained. , Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
