In view of the value of the evidence of the joint intention evidence, Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34), the Prosecutor did not present any plausible explanation for the delay of hours to report the matter to the police. It was not too late for the incident. No conventional weapons were used during the incident, according to the prosecutor's version, the co-accused, who struck the victim's head with a bat, was acquitted of the charge. , And it was added to the benefit of the doubt. The mutual mutation, which was not even supported by medical evidence, is of a reasonable nature in the prosecution's case. There was no evidence and contradictions in the statements of the prosecution witnesses made the suspect's case extremely dubious, and the benefit of every doubt was to be raised. The accused's right to the court can be mistaken in excluding 100 offenders, An innocent person should not be prosecuted on suspicion, in which case, the ad fails to establish his case against the accused, especially when the motives in this case were not intended and the trial proceeded. The sentence recorded in the judgment was not declared a crime, and was ordered to be released, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
