Sections 302 (b) and 377 convictions, the value of the evidence to the benefit of the suspect, who was the manager of the hotel concerned, was quite unnatural, as he was responsible for the management of the hotel. Was going In such a situation, the police's immediate reaction was to knock on the door of the room to find out the cause of the baby's crying, by going to the police and informing them about the cries of the deceased in the room. The manager made several dishonest reforms to bring the case to the forefront of the prosecution's story, and created no deficiency in the prosecutor's case, none of the witnesses and the investigating officer found blood or semen stains on the mattress. But the minor was allegedly injured, especially when bleeding into the room, the investigating officer did not find any piece of cloth or towel that could be used for CL. The Investigation Officer's blood or seizure was not beyond the board, as he himself became the complainant of the case, and without his justification he himself witnessed the incident in the case of an assigned investigating officer. Started investigating the matter. Inquiries should have been made by another independent officer, especially when 5/6 investigating officers were present at the police station. The delay in the recovery of the dead body of the deceased was 4 days, and it was unacceptable for any legal Without justification, the Investigation Officer conducted a mini-grouping and DNA test to link the suspect to the commission of the crime. No hotel employee was interrogated. Medical evidence also contradicts the victim's death, which involved the crime.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
