Section 2 302 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the complaint was presented by a two-version trial, namely, by the prosecutor, by the complainant and the prosecutor's witness, and second by the statement of the accused under section 2342. , The CRF did not explicitly explain the delay of approximately ten to ten hours in filing an FIR that the possibility of discussions and consultations could not be denied by the complainant, Under the circumstances a post mortem was also conducted in this case. With a delay of approximately 14 hours from the death of the prosecutor's story, which did not appeal to common sense, the prosecution's testimony was not credible, which was not a resident of the village where the incident occurred, witnessing the prosecution. The case was controversial, with medical evidence and prosecution witnesses having their cases adjusted to medical evidence to improve their previous statements. The exact ocular and medical evidence raised suspicion about the prosecution's case as alleged by the prosecutor, the alleged restoration of the Repeater 12 bore gun did not prove, the prosecution's trial was of no use because Franzek was on record. No science lab reports. The two accused were acquitted by the trial court for linking the accused to the alleged crime and said that Brayat had attained final status because the claim was not made by the state or by the complainant who showed it. That the complainant was satisfied to be acquitted, the prosecutor failed to prove his case against the accused beyond the shadow of a doubt, extending his conviction and sentence to the benefit of his suspicion.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
