O IX, Rr 6, 7, 13 and Section 96 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Articles 164 and 181 Suit for Declaration of Ex-Procedure and O IX, Rr. 6 and Application 7, CPC Order IX, R 7, CPC provided remedies against the order passed under O IX, R 6, CPC Limitation Act 1908, O IX, R 7, CPC order IX provided no limit (s) for filing an application under R 7. , The CPC itself ruled to limit the filing of an application for separation of the former party proceedings; the application for the separation of the former party proceedings could have been filed at or before such hearing ( In which case the previous Partition Disorder occurred). The same court refused to inquire into an order approved under O IX, R 6, CPC, and, therefore, the defendant cannot demand that the former parties be kept separate by an application under O IX, R 13. Yes, the CPC defendant may demand that the former party be kept separate. Issue an order either by filing an application under O IX, R 13, CP, or preferring an appeal under section 96, CPC, pursuant to Article 164 of the Act Action 1908 under OMX, R13. It was 30 days to file the petition, Article 164 of the Limitation Act 1908 was divided into two parts; in the first part it was argued that the limitation period from the decree was 30 days while in the second part it was provided. It has been held that if the summons is not properly presented then the period of thirty days from the date of the date shall be computed in Article 1 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the first summons. Defendant's body has since been released to defendant when he received a decree
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
