In the Q Qun Qanun testimony (Article 1984 Article 57 of 10), the plaintiff's informants, who had shown slight contradictions in the statements of witnesses, also specifically mentioned the date, time and place of the sale of the suit land and the suit property. Details The defense did not break its statement about the date, time and place of the matter, which contained minute discrepancies. The statements of the plaintiff's witnesses were on the record which could have occurred when a person's presence had been examined for a very long time and it was not enough to deny his entire testimony. Later, the human mind could not remember the minute details of the conversation. In the present case, the evidence is listed in another case as the evidence was not valid under the law. The plaintiff found none. In combination with measles no. A and the rest of the aforesaid measles were located in the compact block. I proved my relevance except that measles No A was partially accepted.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
