Plaintiffs applying for Article 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2), filed a lawsuit on the prescription rule for a declaration of title that defendant failed to re-understand suit land under defendant. have been. The trial court heard the case before the 60-year deadline, and the order was challenged by a petition filed under section 12 (2), by the trial defendant. The parties accepted the request without recording evidence, setting aside the decree. And the lawsuit was dismissed against litigation cases where the decree was challenged without deception, fraud or any jurisdiction without a jurisdiction; the court first had to see if the case was legal. Or not and then check to see if there is any fraud or misrepresentation. Was made out of the available records when the prescription was brought on the basis of history was not present in the book of the Constitution when the case itself was against the provisions of the law, so the trial court would not enjoy it. And therefore the passage of this decree does not have any privilege in the eyes of the law.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
