Sections 496A & 496B Removal of a woman with criminal intent or getting away with or neglecting them The complainant commission of evidence did not charge any body by name and also kidnapped / against unknown accused. There were no allegations of prostitution or adultery. An additional statement was not available to prove that the accused and the accompanying accomplices were removed from the alleged abduction in the additional statement, and the accused was subsequently charged with committing adultery by a female medical officer. The alleged victim was examined, no traces of torture were found on his body, and no scratches, bruises or abrasions were seen on the body of the alleged victim, before the vagina was examined. During this time, V / VOS was found to be closed, and A / V size was normal. The circumstances can be brought on record to prove the commission of adultery by Mann and there is no evidence to kidnap / persuade the victim involved. As the in-laws in the accused's law, it was not appropriate to show that the in-laws would help the married woman bring her in-laws home for the purpose of marriage, as her daughter's co-wife had been living the life of her own daughter. Will destroy. Involvement of the accompanying co-accused was enough to prove the prosecution's story wrong, contradicting the statement of the female suspect, her medical report and the lady doctor's statement about the commission of the illegal intercourse. Was canceled, which will not help in any way. Otherwise, the prosecution
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
