MUNIR A. SHEIKH, J SH. MUHAMMAD HANIF versus FAHMIDA SULTANA
Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) MaximControlled Ownership of Property Owned to Rent Tenant Scope Landlady was 80 years of age in controlling the execution of the eviction order. And wanted to open a tuition center in it. After his leave, the cover was previously vacated by the previous tenant at the same rent and after opening the tuition center instead. The landlord re-rented the premises, the rent controller dismissed the eviction request, but the appellate court allowed it to halt the implementation of the same groundless order that demanded that the landlord have a personal need. , Which was more than 80 years old, was not established. The tenant was that the tenant controller, using his discretion, rightly rejected the withdrawal request which was based on valid judicial principles and the record examining the evidence on rent was further claimed. That the order of the rent controller was interfered with which they did not argue. The rental controller or knowing that the discretion was not used judicially or suffered the same discretion.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Mubarik Pur lawyer