Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAR versus MUHAMMAD

Section Limitation Act (88X of IX), Section High High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Vol 1, CHAP 1B, R7 (C) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Pre-discrimination Case Plaintiff's misrepresentation 19 11 Pla 1973 Due to the absence of a civil judge, the order of the Reader of Court was presented before the Tehsildar, the suit was not banned on time, but 26 on 19 11 1973. 11 1973 was banned for two days, before the plaintiff was presented by the trial court, the civil judge affirming the restoration of the duty suit was affirmed by the first and second appellate courts, without the Reader's Court appropriate. With permission Could not be presented to the tehsildar, the duty of the District Judge was to make another officer authorized for such entertainment. R7 (C), Chapter 1B, High Court's (Lahore) Rules and Orders The plaintiff cannot be held liable for the absence of a civil judge under the section to authorize or substitute the prosecutor. y The absence of a District Judge / Civil Judge District Judge's order or alternative arrangements rarely affects the merits of the plaintiff's case. The provisions of section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1908, shall come to the recovery of the plaintiff, in which no fault can be laid. 19 11 1973 to 25 11 1973 will be considered closed, when the threshold judge was presented before the civil judge and could be delayed hearing on the matter that the court was not working, then the court dismissed the application for leave sanction. ????? to request immigration advocates contact from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer