Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) The return of a reasonable host was promoted to a higher position to restore the gap in salaries of public servants, but when it was discovered that these posts were directly through recruitment. When they were full, the authorities returned them. He was also cleared of important posts and orders for recovery of salaries. Earlier, the service tribunal was dismissed by the service tribunal before the department's offers and appeals from public servants, though authorities recovered salaries. Was banned. It was that the authorities could not impose a reduction in the positions of office bearers who were not appointed to the appointment of posts through the appointment of public servants, all the officials simultaneously found that these posts were directly recruited. So, this was not the case with the reduction of penalties by strengthening appointments, but initially, government employees would never be considered as promoted. The service tribunal did justice in directing that the salaries made by the government employees against the advanced positions would not be made public employees against whom they acted. During the relevant period the post was entitled to the payment of such post in high office; the decision of the service tribunal which did not face any illegal proceedings was denied permission to appeal. list of supreme court advocates from Kahror Pacca lawyer