DELTA WEAVERS (PVT.) LIMITED versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LIMITED
Section 10, 17 and 22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 12 (2), 151 and O. XIII, R2 suit banking court for the absence of defendant on 30 10 10 to recover the loan amount. The leave application was dismissed and the order was dismissed in 2001, when only XIII, R 2, the bank's application under CPC, section 12 (2), was decided for hearing of the respondent's request under CPC. If so, the banking court was disqualified for setting aside the judgment / order, neither the case nor the leave application was sought for hearing on 30 2001 10 2001, but rather for permission to submit additional documents. Whether the bank's The petition was to be brought for hearing only, then the order to exclude the petition shows that the matter was referred to as if only a formal proceeding was being completed, which was not in accordance with the law. It would be ineligible to mention the wrong supply. The matter had to be dealt with under section 151, CPC, which was unanimously mentioned. In the title of the application under section 12 (2), the CPC Banking Court had taken irrevocable decisions and proceedings without legal authority during the approval of the order, the High Court accepted the appeal and the unclean decision / order Put aside, this will result in the application filed by the bank under O: XIII, R 2 assuming that the CPC, along with the leave request, is pending before the Banking Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Chowk Azam lawyer