Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus THE STATE

Section 302 (c) evidence was defined as two versions of the case, one was forwarded by the prosecution and the other was given by the accused version, supported by the inquiry officer as well as the sister of the accused. Appeared before the court's investigating officer. Investigation that the prosecution's leadership had failed to prove a vote against the accused in the dark of night, and no electric light was shown at the time of the incident, was witnessed on the spot. The unnatural story seemed to be in the FIR. And on the occasion, the presence of eyewitnesses was untrustworthy and suspicious when the prosecution's version was denied by the court, then the accused's statement should be fully accepted in the trial court when the section 2302 (b) ) The accused were not convicted under PPC and a case has been registered. In the case of serious and sudden outrage, he had found him guilty of Finder Section 302 (c), PPC, but neither the state nor the complainant had moved the High Court against it. ), The PPC accused was able to prove its version before the trial court and the High Court accused also convicted him under Section 302 (c), PPC, but his conviction Was reduced to 18 years. Under this, Section 382B, RI for 7 years with the benefit of CR PC top advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer