Find a Lawyer

ABDUL NADEEM PARACHA versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) Contempt of Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149 bail, immediate inquiry FIR grant was filed and the accused was designated in this case the accused was declared a participant in the activity. Was shared and shared intent with the co-accused. The reception of the accompanying accused to the murder was not relevant because the evidence of the prosecution was to be independently reviewed The accused remained fugitive for 5/2 years and said that the fugitive would usually be considered as additional evidence against the accused. He was declared innocent. If the arrest was not taken by the investigating officer or by the police, there was no basis for the acceptance of the bail, as the opinion of the police was not based on any good reason, even otherwise the court was not bound. There was nothing on record that the accused had ever been involved in the investigation. Prior to the arrest, the accused, who was involved in a heinous crime in which three people were brutally killed in broad daylight and three accomplices were still in large numbers, was denied his bail plea, Under the circumstances online advocate from Killa Abdullah lawyer