Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMAD versus THE STATE

Sections 497 (2) and 161 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, the names of the further investigators were not listed in the FIR nor were they put on an identity test. No defamatory article was recovered. There was only evidence against them in the form of statements of three persons listed under Section 161, CRPC, which showed that the accused were linked to a crime which was not only natural. , But was also included under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1); CRPC made such statements, however, showing that the person making the statements did not see the accused as guilty. ? The question is whether, on the basis of such statements, the accused can be held liable for the alleged offense, requiring further investigation against the accused under Section 497 (2). The CCP and he were entitled to bail under the circumstances as they were former offenders immigration advocates email from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer