MST. HAJIRAN BIBI versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Adultery (Ordinance Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10/16 bail, further inquiry suspect's grant was ignited by his co-accused and the case against the accused was filed almost 13 days later. A copy of the lawsuit was also attached to the complainant for dissolving the marriage 9 days before the accused filed a criminal case against the accused in the request for his bail with the accused. The victim admitted that the complainant had fired her. About 2 1/2 years before the dissolution of the marriage case against the complainant, the house was adjourned before the Family Court, no direct evidence of adultery was against the accused and it is yet to be seen whether Can be charged. The crime of adultery case, under the circumstances, was covered under Section 497, sub-section (2) of the CCP, and further investigations alleged that the accused was the mother of five children, extended extension on Rangers' bail. After his departure, he was granted bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Lalamusa lawyer
