Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus SEVEN-UP BOTTLING COMPANY (PVT.) LTD.


Section 29 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) tube well fees, the imposition of such fees was removed before the High Court under the constitutional jurisdiction; The fees charged were set aside. Was against the provisions of section 29 (2) of the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975. Only the installation of tube wells was banned without the permission of the Lahore Development Authority. Under section 29 (2) of the Lahore Development Authority Act 1975, the Lahore Development Authority could not collect the fee. The decision passed by the Tube Wells High Court under section 29 of the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975 was in accordance with the provisions of the Lahore Development Authority Act 1975, and no appeal for any illegal interference was refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.