Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus MRS. SULTAN SAUD

The plaintiffs claiming to recover Section 73 damages claimed that the defendants' failure to provide air-conditioned railway coaches, where they had specific seats, had to travel on the relevant date under the general coach's protest, thus, They suffered mental distress. Under the heat and temperature defendants, the month of July was that the air-conditioned coaches could not be provided to the railway head clerk while neither the witness nor any technical fault was provided. A record of the same was made available, which was heard by the trial court. In the review, the appellate court and the High Court upheld the order, nor did the defendants present evidence to prove that the air-conditioned coaches suffered any technical damage, nor did any of the cases have such effect. Has been dealt with by the authorities in a very comfortable way. The large number of plaintiffs traveling to benefit from the damages and hardships faced by the public were judged by the fact that the air-conditioned class seat, in view of the prevailing temperature and climate in July in such a part of the country, It was determined that the defendants had suffered psychological distress due to the defendant's behavior and treatment. The trial court tried to justify their shameful act by damaging only one token. Department officials have wasted a lot of public money for such litigation over a decade. The High Court's appeal to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 183 (3) registration advocate from Nawab Shah lawyer