Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ AKHTAR versus CHIEF INSPECTOR OF MINES

Para 16 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) of the Post Office of the Electrical and Mechanical Cadre Base Seniority Low Fitness Qualification Repeat mechanic of Diploma Instrument Technology Post. Assigned to the rescue apparatus technician. The respondent public servant was employed as a mechanic in 1986, while the applicant employed a public servant in the year 1987, as the electrician petitioner was promoted to public servant and the defendant was not a civil servant. The service tribunal considered for publicity allowed the appeal filed by the plaintiff public servant and was promoted to the position which the applicant public servant had raised, even if the name change was put aside. The defendant, a civil servant, was not entitled to development in his position. He said that the precision in electrical / mechanical technology was obtained not in apparatus technics but in diploma in instrument technology under the Punjab Labor and Main Power Inspectorate of Mine Service Rules. Under U-16, five years of experience were also eligible for promotion, the service tribunal said. Both sides did not examine the matter; the applicant was also eligible for a government employee primary fax. Instead of promoting the cadre of the Forman Supreme Court, it was appropriate for the respondent government employee to remand the service tribunal for a re-examination of the case, instead of ending the question of progress on the post of Forman. After providing the two parties with a reasonable opportunity of hearing, the Punjab Labor and Manpower Power Department Inspector of Mine Service rolls into paragraph 16 of 1993 immigration advocates contact from Ugoki lawyer