In section 2 302 (b) and 34 of the convictions, the benefit of the suspected FIR, as defined in the joint intention evidence, was registered more than hours after the incident, excluding the possibility of deliberation and consultation by the prosecution. Can not be done. The complainant's house is about a kilometer from the scene, in his presence at the relevant time, was not free from any suspicion, identification of the accused in the early hours of the day was not easy, the task prosecution witness who witnessed the incident. Was not a resident of the time, failed to prove his presence at the time of the incident, he was declared a witness of the occasion The best evidence in the present case was the statement of the disputed house detainees. The incident happened, but none of them was examined by the prosecution before the trial court could not prove the motive, no firearms were recovered from any of the accused persons. The tarnished co-accused was the culprit of the accused, the prosecution failed to prove the accused in the trial, the convict was convicted and acquitted by trial. He was charged with extending his suspicion and was released, under circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
