ROSHAN ARA versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
RR 3 and 16 (c) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Lease Agreement, Renewal of Rent Estimation The applicant's position (lease) was that it had acquired the land on lease for five years from 1996 to 1996. That was to be renewed for another five-year term and the lease period was extended to five years, which was Rs 36,60603 monthly, on 31st August 2007, however, the authorities had promised. The lease term will be extended by another five years but instead of fulfilling the promise, after the completion of the auction, the rent was raised illegally and the maximum bid was raised. A notice was put on it which he accepted under protest and the rental rate was increased without mutual negotiation, the parties were bound by mutual agreement which was written in black and white. The first agreement, implemented in 1996, was later terminated by the lease agreements which proved effective. o The new terms for renewal of the mutual agreement were renewed by the parties on 31 8 2007 and a 10% annual increase on the new rate was also agreed. The rental rate and the new terms must be agreed by mutual consent. Had no right to extend the rent unilaterally, nor extended the lease, the pension of the consent of the other party had withdrawn the petition filed under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and accepted the terms of the award in which it was It appears that the current rent was agreed to by mutual consent. 3 of the Punjab Local Government (Property) Rules were without power as the rolls could not have any effect on the previous and the auction notification
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
