Find a Lawyer

SYED PERVEZ MUSHARRAF versus RETURNING OFFICER NA-48, ISLAMABAD

Sections 14 and 99 (1A) (g) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 and 63 nomination papers, based on the findings of the Supreme Court decision, the applicant was disqualified from contesting the election due to the rejection of the Returning Officer. ? There was no mandatory direction or declaration in any decision related to his disqualification to participate in the election; the decision was taken by the Supreme Court after the imposition of the emergency of the appellant. And dismissed the unconstitutional appeal. \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• ROSHAN ARA v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Local Government 2013 YLR 2376
• ABDUL GHAFFAR alias KALU v. State 2013 YLR 2383
• Raja PERVEZ ASHRAF v. RETURNING OFFICER, NA-51 2013 YLR 2397
• NAZAKAT ALI v. State 2013 YLR 2411
• Mst. SHAHNAZ BIBI v. State 2013 YLR 2431
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2013 YLR 2443
• ZAHID JAVED v. Haji ABDUL SATTAR through Legal heirs 2013 YLR 2457
• KANWAR MEHMOOD AHMED v. Rao TAHIR ALI KHAN 2013 YLR 2484

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Chunian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes