In section 2 302 (c) Qatil Ahmed revealed in an inquest report of the value of the evidence that the accused had committed suicide by the prosecution's witnesses, admitting that he had not seen the incident, but that he had charged the accused with these two witnesses. The statement of the assassin was to be a killer, though in full acceptance, that would indicate that there was a dispute between the victim and the accused, and that the contradiction over several material points encouraged confidence. Medical evidence could only support ocular evidence in connection with the recovery, and the location of the injury, the weapon used, the injury and the death. N's duration, the presence of witnesses or the accused in the presence of the injured prosecution, but it did not provide any relevant evidence of the names of the attackers, itself, was the last seen between the victim and the accused, and no dispute of the accused's guilt. There was no evidence and the accused was not put in their condition. The charges filed under Section 2342, CRPC, and could not be used against them against the prosecutor's story were suspected to have been alleged in nature.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
