Find a Lawyer

KANWAR MEHMOOD AHMED versus RAO TAHIR ALI KHAN

Section 172 (2) (xviii) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Sections 9 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the suit which declares and the permanent injunction is forbidden in favor of common agricultural land The burden of proving the plaintiff's family settlement on the basis of oral family division / settlement based on the claim will depend largely on the plaintiff if such possession is not sufficient to prove the family settlement, if the family division matters. If I had already been challenged before the revenue court civil court. Such land had no jurisdiction under section 172 (2) (xviii) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• Syed PERVEZ MUSHARRAF v. RETURNING OFFICER NA-48, ISLAMABAD 2013 YLR 2422
• Mst. SHAHNAZ BIBI v. State 2013 YLR 2431
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2013 YLR 2443
• ZAHID JAVED v. Haji ABDUL SATTAR through Legal heirs 2013 YLR 2457
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. MUHAMMAD SHAFI 2013 YLR 2494
• TAFSEER ABBAS SHAH v. State 2013 YLR 2505
• MUKHTAR AHMAD v. RAHEELA SABIR 2013 YLR 2521
• Sheikh RASHEED AHMED v. BADAR ZIA 2013 YLR 2530

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Ludhan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes