LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE versus SAIMA RIAZ
O XVII, R 3 At the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court directed the plaintiff to file a modified case, acting on legal heirs. The trial court closed the evidence of the plaintiff and the decree, while the amended plaintiff's case was not filed; the appellate court maintained that the plaintiff did not file the amended case. The closure of the defendant's evidence was not created, even if the case was adjourned on his request for evidence, the appellate court did not consider that aspect; the High Court accepted the review request. The plaintiff has been instructed to file an amended case on the due date. The defendants will then present evidence by the trial court on the due date.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gaggo Mandi lawyer
