Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HABIB SUBHANI versus MUHAMMAD AMEEN

The default documents in the payment of rent for sections 13 and 15 proved from the evidence that despite the demand, the tenant had failed to pay the rent for the alleged period of four months and the rate of payable was 25% three years later. Failure to pay higher rent than was also required under section 5A of the West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, the landlord's lawyer dismissed on oath that it was demanded that the relief lawyer not be cross-paid by the tenant. Was gone, then the unlawful statement of the landlord's lawyer, onus was transferred to the tenant to prove that the landlord The tenant could not prove that the landlord had paid the rent because he refused to accept the landlord's contentious rent and sent it through a money order and the landlord also refused to accept the money order. A further ambiguous statement was made that the landlord was compensated for the disputed period, but nothing was offered by the tenant to show how the rent was paid, even by the tenant. The witness presented also confessed during Cross E that the tenant did not pay the landlord in his presence. , In the case of controversial pay rent, to pay the rent in the rent paid by the Appellate Court had previously been scheduled to be supported. Was it that the landlord could not prove the tenancy process and he failed to make a fraudulent receipt of the rent payment receipts, saying that the reasoning was neither reasonable nor logical and that the landlord and the tenant The Reality of Beard Relationships best advocate from Kharan lawyer