ZAHOOR AHMED versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 377 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 bail, the accused further inquiry against the accused was that he had approached 13/14. Killed the boy. The relevant section HO related and D section P during the investigation had declared the case against the accused wrong and recommended to cancel the case, but a report was made to exclude the accused from the case, but from it There was no agreement. The magistrate's legal report of the alleged victim related to the magistrate shows that his outer anal area is normal, also because the affected boy's anal swabs were not stained in the mini-case against the accused, Under the circumstances, one of them investigated his crime under Section 497 (2), the CRPC accused, who had been behind bars for the past four months, to pass the bail to the previous offender. Was entitled, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Chicha watni lawyer
